Lion Strategy

Expertise

Where we have
pattern recognition.

Sector knowledge is valuable when it changes the questions an adviser asks, the risks they notice and the evidence they trust.

01

AI & intelligent systems

The strategic question is not whether AI matters. It is where performance and economics are sufficient to redesign the workflow - and where human judgement must remain accountable.

Patterns we recognise

Demonstrations that do not survive deployment

Productivity claims omitting integration and supervision

Agents negotiating in your name, paid by the other side

Governance designed apart from actual system behaviour

Proprietary data exposed to models the business does not control

Decisions we resolve

Which workflows justify investment

Where margin lives once intelligence is commoditised

Whether the harness - memory, context, proprietary process - stays yours

Frontier API, open-weight or self-hosted - and where your data may flow

Which judgements stay human - and at what cognitive debt

The record Agents in production · c.250 senior hours saved in a quarter · apps, agent skills and public tools shipped end-to-end
02

Digital assets & trading

Digital assets, exchanges and payment rails share one question: which new infrastructure is genuinely faster or cheaper to run - and which revenue survives once incentives, liquidity and regulation settle. With the largest asset managers tokenising funds and US regulators admitting tokenised collateral, the question is no longer whether - it is where the economics are real, and who captures them.

Patterns we recognise

Temporary market structure mistaken for durable revenue

Market-maker liquidity or transaction volume mistaken for organic demand

Tokenised assets carrying fewer rights than the assets they mirror

Card or scheme growth extrapolated, not structurally sized

Broker sentiment traded as if it were fundamentals

Decisions we resolve

Where new payment or settlement rails are economically superior

Whether tokenising your product wins distribution - or only re-plumbs cost

Whether a marketplace has durable network effects

How control and counterparty risk change the case

Enter, invest, partner or wait

The record National GGR rebuilt bottom-up · c.€1.7tn of headroom sized across 30 payment markets · 9-figure tanker exposure exited on tonne-mile evidence · 1m+ marketplace rows to an 8-figure exit · commercial impact of MiCA, GENIUS Act and FCA · Personal capital held through two full drawdowns since 2017
03

Consumer & retail

The data can be abundant while the demand logic is wrong. The answer often sits one segmentation below the category the industry uses - and one channel beyond the economics it reports.

Patterns we recognise

Growth purchased after it stopped creating value

External shocks left inside the run-rate

Structural change extrapolated from historic behaviour

Volume used as a proxy for customer value

Decisions we resolve

Which customers and propositions deserve investment

Where growth is genuinely incremental

Which niches grow inside a flat category

What scale and model the evidence supports

Whether margins survive customers who shop by agent

04

Infrastructure & development

Large programmes and developments acquire momentum before demand, capacity and sequence have been independently established. The central risk is building the wrong asset at the wrong scale.

Patterns we recognise

Demand inferred from the proposed capacity

Prestige overriding commercial evidence

Downside tested less hard than the central case

Full scale presented as the only viable option

Decisions we resolve

Demand independent of the proposal

Capacity the market can support

Components that create value

Proceed, resize, resequence or stop

What travels

Different markets. The same decision failures.

The proposed solution is defined before the problem.

Activity is mistaken for demand.

Technical possibility is mistaken for commercial value.

Forecasts inherit rather than test the central assumption.

Momentum makes continuing look safer than stopping.

Advisers are rewarded for validating the largest programme.

See how the pattern changed the answer